Analyzing MOOC Features for Enhancing Students Learning Satisfaction
Keywords:
Learning Management System (LMS), Massive Open Online Course (MOOC), Students Learning Satisfaction,Abstract
This research goal is to identify MOOC features (edX and Coursera) that affect and support students learning satisfaction. The objectives of this research for lecturers are to become an alternative way to conduct learning activity by using the features recommendation and as for students is to support their learning satisfaction that can increase their participation in learning process. The main objective of this research is to find features of Learning Management System (LMS) on Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) based on students learning satisfaction indicators and give feature recommendations for higher education LMS. Data collection method for this research is by spreading 130 questionnaires to students who have participated in MOOC. As for the data analysis, the authors use multiple regression model for analyzing the relationship between the dependent and independent variables and using SPSS Statistics 22 software as a tool for analyzing the collected data. The result from this research shows that communication, lecture and study material, quiz, assignment, and grading features are the features that support students learning satisfaction.References
RISTEKDIKTI, “Status keaktifan PTS di Indonesia per 20 Februari 2016 pukul 08:00 wib,” 20 February 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.kopertis12.or.id/2016/02/20/status-keaktifan-pts-diindonesia-per-20-februari-2016-pukul-0800-wib.html.
S. S. Adkins, “The worldwide market for self-paced elearning products and services: 2010-2015 forecast and analysis,” New Buyers, New Revenues: Self-paced eLearning in High Demand across the Globe , p. 7, July 2011.
D. Shah, “MOOCs in 2013: breaking down the numbers,” EdSurgeNews, 22 December 2013.
B. Nielson, “What’s the difference between a MOOC and an LMS?,” 21 May 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.yourtrainingedge.com/whats-the-difference-between-amooc-and-an-lms/.
S. Banna, “Face-to-face training is still the better choice over digital lessons,” 8 September 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.td.org/Publications/Magazines/TD/TDArchive/2014/09/Webex-Face-to-Face-Training-Is-Still-the-BetterChoice.
BINUS University - IDC, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://cms.binus.edu/datasource/resource/20100105165809047000000 00/tm-0079_ilm.pdf.
P.-S. Chen e J.-T. Chih, “The Relations between Learner Motivation and Satisfaction with Aspects of Management Training: An Empirical Study in Taiwan,” International Journal of Management, vol. 28, no 1, p. 77, 2011.
R. McGuire, “The best MOOC provider: a review of Coursera, Udacity and edX,” 19 June 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.skilledup.com/articles/the-best-mooc-provider-a-review-of-coursera-udacity-and-edx.
D. Shah, “By the numbers: MOOCS in 2015,” 21 December 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-2015-stats/.
O. I. Asiri, “A comparison between international and us graduate students’ attitudes and experiences using massive open online courses (MOOCs),” RIT Scholar Works, p. 3, 2014.
Fundación Telefónica, MOOCs in the education of the future: digitizing training, R. M. S. Peña, Ed., Madrid, 2015, p. 44.
Y.-C. Kuo, A. E. Walker, B. R. Belland e K. E. E. Schroder, “A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs,” The International Review Of Research In Open And Distance Learning, pp. 17-18, 2013.
M. T. Cole, D. J. Shelley e L. B. Swartz, “Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: a three year study,” The International Review Of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2014.
C. C. Lo, “How student satisfaction factors affect perceived learning,” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, p. 48, 2010.
K. Jin-Il, “A study on the K-MOOC platform standardization measures,” International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, vol. 9, no 1, pp. 221-236, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AGREEMENT
The manuscript is herewith submitted for publication in the Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC). It has not been published before, and it is not under consideration for publication in any other journals. It contains no material that is scandalous, obscene, libelous or otherwise contrary to law. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, I, as the author, hereby agree to transfer to JTEC, all rights including those pertaining to electronic forms and transmissions, under existing copyright laws, except for the following, which the author(s) specifically retain(s):
- All proprietary right other than copyright, such as patent rights
- The right to make further copies of all or part of the published article for my use in classroom teaching
- The right to reuse all or part of this manuscript in a compilation of my own works or in a textbook of which I am the author; and
- The right to make copies of the published work for internal distribution within the institution that employs me
I agree that copies made under these circumstances will continue to carry the copyright notice that appears in the original published work. I agree to inform my co-authors, if any, of the above terms. I certify that I have obtained written permission for the use of text, tables, and/or illustrations from any copyrighted source(s), and I agree to supply such written permission(s) to JTEC upon request.
