Design Analysis of Remotely Amphibian Vehicle (RAV) –Underwater Drone

Authors

  • Mohammad ‘Afif Kasno Underwater Technology Research Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia.
  • Mohd Shahrieel Mohd Aras Underwater Technology Research Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia.
  • Yeoh Eik Keong Underwater Technology Research Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia.
  • Fadilah Ab Azis Underwater Technology Research Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia.
  • Anuar Mohamed Kassim Underwater Technology Research Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia.
  • Mohamad Haniff Harun Underwater Technology Research Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia.
  • Mohd Khairi Mohd Zambri Underwater Technology Research Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia.
  • Alias Khamis Underwater Technology Research Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia.

Keywords:

Design Analysis, Remotely Amphibian Vehicle, Solidwork,

Abstract

This project is mainly focusing on the conceptual design and design analysis of the Remotely Amphibian Vehicle (RAV). RAV is considered as an underwater drone or vehicle that can operate autonomously or remotely controlled by a user. The term “amphibian” is referring to a vehicle that is capable of functioning in dual environments, which is in aerial and aquatic. In order to meet that purpose, the ability of flying and submerging are implemented into this RAV. This innovation mends to assist and help human in aquatic operation as well as aerial activity. However, this is still a very recent concept with numbers of limitation and challenge. Challenges like transition in medium has limited and affected the performance of the vehicle in terms of flying capability or submerging ability. Available model in the market is either robust in flying such as quadcopters but imperfect in submerging and vice versa. Hence, this research is to study and analysis of the conceptual design a remote control amphibian vehicle that can fly and submerge models. In order to overcome the challenge mentioned above, denser material is preferable for body frame fabrication. Besides, a body design with low volume is recommended to achieve a better performance in transition medium. To judge the performance of the conceptual design, a series of simulations using SolidWorks will be carried out. At the end of this project, the design will be used to development a remotely amphibian vehicle that operate robustly in two mediums.

References

W. Hong-jian, X. Long, L. Juan, and Z. Hui-nan, “Design, construction of a small unmanned underwater vehicle,” 2013 MTS/IEEE Ocean. - Bergen, pp. 1–6, 2013.

W. H. Wang, X. Q. Chen, a. Marburg, J. G. Chase, and C. E. Hann, “A Low-Cost unmanned underwater vehicle prototype for shallow water tasks,” 2008 IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. Mechatronics Embed. Syst. Appl. MESA 2008, no. 1, pp. 204–209, 2008.

P. L. J. Drews, A. Alves Neto, and M. F. M. Campos, “Hybrid Unmanned Aerial Underwater Vehicle: Modeling and simulation,” no. Iros, pp. 4637–4642, 2014.

Y. Luo, “Intelligent Control and Navigation of an Indoor Quad-copter,” vol. 2014, no. December, pp. 10–12, 2014.

J. Escareño, A. Sanchez, O. Garcia, and R. Lozano, “Triple tilting rotor mini-UAV: Modeling and embedded control of the attitude,” Proc. Am. Control Conf., no. 1, pp. 3476–3481, 2008.

L. B. Vkbr, “Underwater Radio Communication,” Amat. Radio, no. April, pp. 1–8, 1987.

R. Czyba, G. Szafranski, M. Janik, K. Pampuch, and M. Hecel, “Development of co-axial Y6-Rotor UAV - design, mathematical modeling, rapid prototyping and experimental validation,” 2015 Int. Conf. Unmanned Aircr. Syst., pp. 1102–1111, 2015.

K. K. A. David, R. R. Vicerra, A. A. Bandala, L. A. G. Lim, and E. P. Dadios, “using Fuzzy Logic,” pp. 126–131, 2013.

M. Pouliot and J. T. Smith, “Integrated Mission Planning Architectures ForUnmanned Underwater Vehicles,” Auton. Underw. Veh. Technol. 1992. AUV ’92. Proc. 1992 Symp, pp. 85–90, 1992.

K. B. Simbulan, K. K. David, R. R. Vicerra, R. Atienza, and E. Dadios, “A Neural Network Model for a 5-thruster Unmanned Underwater Vehicle.”

Mohd Shahrieel Mohd Aras, Shahrum Shah Abdullah, Ahmad Fadzli Nizam Abdul Rahman, Norhaslinda Hasim, Fadilah Abdul Azis, Lim Wee Teck, Arfah Syahida Mohd Nor, Depth Control of an Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle using Neural Network Predictive Control, Jurnal Terknologi, 74:9 (2015) 85–93 , 2015.

Mohd Shahrieel Mohd Aras, Lim Wee Teck, Fadilah Abdul Azis, Arfah Syahida Mohd Nor, Norhaslinda Hasim Comparison Of Depth Control Form Surface and Bottom Set Point of an Unmanned Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle using PID Controller, Jurnal Terknologi, 74:9 (2015), 105–111, 2015.

Mohd Aras, Mohd Shahrieel and Abdullah, Shahrum Shah and Abdul Rahman, Ahmad Fadzli Nizam and Md Basar, Mohd Farriz and Anuar, Mohamed Kassim and Jaafar, Hazriq Izzuan (2015) Analysis of movement for unmanned underwater vehicle using a low cost integrated sensor. AIP Conference Proceedings. 070052-1. ISSN 0094-243X.

Mohd Aras, Mohd Shahrieel and Abdullah, Shahrum Shah and Baharin, Kyairul Azmi and Mohd Nor, Arfah Syahida and Mohd Zambri, Mohd Khairi (2015) Model identification of an underwater remotely operated vehicle using system identification approach based on NNPC. International Review of Automatic Control (IREACO), 8 (2). pp. 149-154. ISSN 1974-6059

Mohd Aras, Mohd Shahrieel and Abdullah, Shahrum Shah and Kamarudin, Muhammad Nizam and Abdul Rahman, Ahmad Fadzli Nizam and Abdul Azis, Fadilah and Jaafar, Hazriq Izzuan (2015) Observer based output feedback tuning for underwater remotely operated vehicle based on linear quadratic performance. AIP Conference Proceedings. 070051-1. ISSN 0094-243X

Mohd Aras, Mohd Shahrieel and Jaafar, Hazriq Izzuan and Anuar , Mohamed Kassim (2013) Tuning Process Of Single Input Fuzzy Logic Controller Based On Linear Control Surface Approximation Method For Depth Control Of Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 8 (6). pp. 208-214. ISSN 1816-949X

Mohd Aras, Mohd Shahrieel and Abdul Rahman, Ahmad Fadzli Nizam (2013) Analysis of an Improved Single Input Fuzzy Logic Controller Designed For Depth Control Using Microbox 2000/2000c Interfacing. International Review of Automatic Control, 6 (6). pp. 728-733. ISSN 1974-6059.

Mohd Aras, Mohd Shahrieel and Mohd Shah, Hairol Nizam and Ab Rashid, Mohd Zamzuri (2013) Robust Control Of Adaptive Single Input Fuzzy Logic Controller For Unmanned Underwater Vehicle. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 57 (3). pp. 372-379. ISSN 1992-8645

E. P. Flynn, “Low-cost approaches to UAV design using advanced manufacturing techniques,” 2013 IEEE Integr. STEM Educ. Conf., pp. 1–4, 2013.

S. Jeremia, E. Kuantama, and J. Pangaribuan, “Design and construction of remote-controlled quad-copter based on STC12C5624AD,” Proc. 2012 Int. Conf. Syst. Eng. Technol. ICSET 2012, pp. 3–7, 2012.

K. Patel and J. Barve, “Modeling, simulation and control study for the quad-copter UAV,” 2014 9th Int. Conf. Ind. Inf. Syst., pp. 1–6, 2014.

I. Manarvi, M. Aqib, and M. Ajmal, “Design and development of a quad copter (UMAASK) using CAD/CAM/CAE,” Aerosp., pp. 1–10, 2013.

a. Nemati and M. Kumar, “Modeling and control of a single axis tilting quadcopter,” Proc. Am. Control Conf., pp. 3077–3082, 2014.

M. Piccoli and M. Yim, “Passive stability of a single actuator micro aerial vehicle,” 2014 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., pp. 5510–5515, 2014.

A. Razinkova, I. Gaponov, and H.-C. Cho, “Adaptive control over quadcopter UAV under disturbances,” 2014 14th Int. Conf. Control. Autom. Syst. (ICCAS 2014), no. Iccas, pp. 386–390, 2014.

C. Molina, R. Belfort, R. Pol, O. Chacon, L. Rivera, D. Ramos, and E. I. O. Rivera, “The use of unmanned aerial vehicles for an interdisciplinary undergraduate education: Solving quadrotors limitations,” Front. Educ. Conf. (FIE), 2014 IEEE, pp. 1–6, 2014.

M. Q. Huynh, W. Zhao, and L. Xie, “L 1 Adaptive Control for Quadcopter: Design and Implementation,” vol. 2014, no. December, pp. 10–12, 2014.

E. Chirtel, R. Knoll, C. Le, B. Mason, N. Peck, J. Robarge, and G. C. Lewin, “Designing a Spatially Aware , Autonomous Quadcopter Using the Android Control Sensor System,” vol. 00, no. c, pp. 35–40, 2015.

B. J. Emran, J. Dias, L. Seneviratne, and G. Cai, “Robust Adaptive Control Design for Quadcopter Payload Add and Drop Applications,” pp. 3252–3257, 2015.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-15

How to Cite

Kasno, M. ‘Afif, Mohd Aras, M. S., Keong, Y. E., Ab Azis, F., Mohamed Kassim, A., Harun, M. H., Mohd Zambri, M. K., & Khamis, A. (2017). Design Analysis of Remotely Amphibian Vehicle (RAV) –Underwater Drone. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 9(3-2), 35–38. Retrieved from https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/2809

Most read articles by the same author(s)