A Construction of Service-Oriented Architecture Adoption Maturity Levels using Adoption of Innovation Concept and CMMI


  • Mohd Hamdi Irwan Hamzah School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia. Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Johor, Malaysia.
  • Fauziah Baharom School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • Haslina Mohd School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • Mohd Hasbullah Omar School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia.


Software Engineering, Service-Oriented Architecture Adoption, Sustainable Development, Maturity Level,


The existing Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) maturity models constructed their maturity level focuses on the level after the implementation of SOA in the organization. However, less work has been carried out regarding the SOA maturity level that focused on the whole process of SOA adoption including the pre-adoption level. Furthermore, this study also found that less work on constructing the maturity levels for measuring the SOA adoption existed. Therefore, this study aims to construct the Service-Oriented Architecture adoption maturity level by combining the adoption of innovation concept with Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI). This study constructs the lower level of the proposed SOA adoption maturity level based on the adoption of innovation concept and the upper level based on CMMI and the existing SOA maturity models. This study has successfully shown that the adoption of innovation concept can be combined with CMMI in order to construct a holistic maturity level for evaluating the SOA adoption. This level covers the whole SOA adoption processes ranging from the pre-adoption level up to the optimized level. This study also aims at evaluating the SOA adoption toward sustainable development. Sustainable development means that the teams work at consistence and continuous speed to produce a quality result. Thus, the proposed maturity level may benefit the SOA practitioner and software quality assurance in software engineering domain.


R. T. Frambach and N. Schillewaert, “Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 163–176, 2002.

F. Damanpour and J. Daniel Wischnevsky, “Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovationadopting organizations,” J. Eng. Technol. Manag. - JET-M, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 269–291, 2006.

R. Welke, R. Hirschheim, and A. Schwarz, “Maturity,” Computer (Long. Beach. Calif)., vol. 44, no. February, pp. 61–67, 2011.

M. Abdul Manan, “Developing a framework and a scorecard method to measure the enterprise – wide SOA implementation readiness of an organisation,” University of Wollongong, 2013.

S. Pulparambil and Y. Baghdadi, “A Comparison Framework for SOA Maturity Models,” 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom, pp. 1102–1107, 2015.

N. Joachim, F. Schlosser, D. Beimborn, and T. Weitzel, “Does SOA Create or Require IT / Business Collaboration ? Investigating SOA ’ s Potential to Reduce the Gap Between IT and Business,” Thirty Second Int. Conf. Inf. Syst., pp. 1–19, 2011.

CMMI Product Team, “Capability Maturity Model ® Integration ( CMMI SM ), Version 1.1,” no. August, pp. 1–645, 2002.

N. Joachim, D. Beimborn, P. Hoberg, and F. Schlosser, “Examining the organizational decision to adopt service-oriented architecture (SOA) - development of a research model,” Digit 2009 Proc., vol. 4, 2009.

E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of innovations. 1995.

Y. Baghdadi, “SOA Maturity Models: Guidance to Realize SOA,” Int. J. Comput. Commun. Eng., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 372–378, 2014.

N. Joachim, “A Literature Review of Research on Service- Oriented Architectures ( SOA ): Characteristics , Adoption Determinants , Governance Mechanisms , and Business Impact,” Am. Conf. Inf. Syst., pp. 1–11, 2011.

T. Mettler, “Maturity assessment models : a design science research approach,” International Journal of Society Systems Science, vol. 3, 2011.

C. Rathfelder and H. Groenda, “ISOAMM: An independent SOA maturity model,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 5053 LNCS, pp. 1– 15, 2008.

H. Kreger, T. Carrato, A. Arsanjani, A. Szakal, J. Diaz, and K. Holley, “IBM Advantage for Service Maturity Model Standards,” no. August, pp. 1–22, 2009.

M. Veger, “A stage maturity model for the adoption of an enterprisewide service-oriented architecture (SMM-SOA): a multicase study research,” p. 93, 2008.

F. Meier, “Service Oriented Architecture Maturity Models : A guide to SOA Adoption,” University of Skovde, 2006.

S. Mishra, S. Mazumdar, and D. Suar, “Place attachment and flood preparedness,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 187–197, 2010.

N. Ehsan, A. Perwaiz, J. Arif, E. Mirza, and A. Ishaque, “CMMI / SPICE based Process Improvement,” in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (ICMIT), pp. 859–862, 2010.

L. Lasrado and R. K. Vatrapu, “Maturity Models Development in Is Research: a Literature Review,” Proc. 38th Inf. Syst. Res. Semin. Scand. (IRIS 38), no. August 9-12, 2015.

G. Zaltman, R. Duncan, and J. Holbek, Innovations and Organizations. Wiley, New York, 1973.

D. Nagy, “Understanding organizational adoption theories through the adoption of a disruptive innovation: Five cases of open source software,” ProQuest Diss. Theses, vol. Ph.D., 2010.

C. Sonic Software, Corporation; AmberPoint, Inc.; BearingPoint, Inc.; Systinet, “A new Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Maturity Model.” 2005.

J. Schelp and S. Aier, “SOA and EA - Sustainable contributions for increasing corporate agility,” Proc. 42nd Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. HICSS, pp. 1–8, 2009.

S. Pulparambil and Y. Baghdadi, “SOA maturity model a frame of reference,” in 2016 IEEE Students’ Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science, 2016, pp. 1–6.

J. P. Wisdom, K. H. B. Chor, K. E. Hoagwood, and S. M. Horwitz, “Innovation adoption: A review of theories and constructs,” Adm. Policy Ment. Heal. Ment. Heal. Serv. Res., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 480–502, 2014.

S. Inaganti and S. Aravamudan, “SOA Maturity Model,” BPTrends, no. April, pp. 1–23, 2007.




How to Cite

Hamzah, M. H. I., Baharom, F., Mohd, H., & Omar, M. H. (2018). A Construction of Service-Oriented Architecture Adoption Maturity Levels using Adoption of Innovation Concept and CMMI. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 10(2-4), 23–27. Retrieved from https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/4301

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>