Time Based Traffic Policing and Shaping Algorithms on Campus Network Internet Traffic
Keywords:
Policing, Shaping, Bandwidth Management, Internet Traffic, Quality of Service, Goodness of Fit, AndersonDarling,Abstract
This paper presents the development of algorithm on Policing and Shaping Traffic for bandwidth management which serves as Quality of Services (QoS) in a Campus network. The Campus network is connected with a 16 Mbps Virtual Private Network line to the internet Wide Area Network. Both inbound and outbound real internet traffic were captured and analyzed. Goodness of Fit (GoF) test with Anderson-darling (AD) was fitted to real traffic to identify the best distribution. The Best-fitted Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) model was used to analyze and characterized the data and the parameters. Based on the identified parameters, a new Time Based Policing and Shaping algorithm have been developed and simulated. The policing process drops the burst traffic, while the shaping process delays traffic to the next time transmissions. Mathematical model to formulate the controlled algorithm on burst traffic with selected time has been derived. Inbound traffic threshold control burst was policed at 1200 MByte (MB) while outbound traffic threshold was policed at 680 MB in the algorithms. The algorithms were varied in relation to the identified Weibull parameters to reduce the burst. The analysis shows that the higher shape parameter value that relates to the lower burst of network throughput can be controlled. This research presented a new method for time based bandwidth management and an enhanced network performance by identifying new traffic parameters for traffic modeling in Campus network.References
Kashihara S. and Tsurusawa M. 2010. Dynamic Bandwidth Management System Using IP Flow Analysis for the QoS-Assured Network. Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010), 2010 IEEE. 1-5.
Fugui W. and Mohapatra P. 2001. An efficient bandwidth management scheme for real-time Internet applications," in Intelligent Multimedia, Video and Speech Processing, 2001. Proceedings International Symposium. 469-472.
De O Schmidt R., Sadre R., Melnikov N., Schonwalder J., and Pras A. 2014. Linking network usage patterns to traffic Gaussianity fit. Networking Conference, FIP. 1-9.
Baogang C., Yong X., Jinlong H., and Ling Z. 2008. Modeling and Analysis Traffic Flows of Peer-to-Peer Application. Innovative Computing Information and Control, 2008. ICICIC '08. 3rd International Conference. 383-383.
Hosoki S., Arakawa S., and Murata M. 2010. A Model of Link Capacities in ISP's Router-Level Topology. Autonomic and Autonomous Systems (ICAS), 2010 Sixth International Conference. 162-167.
Arfeen M. A., Pawlikowski K., Willig A., and McNickle D. 2014. Internet traffic modelling: from superposition to scaling. Networks, IET.3: 30-40.
Kailasam S., Gnanasambandam N., Dharanipragada J., and Sharma N. 2013. Optimizing Ordered Throughput Using Autonomic Cloud Bursting Schedulers. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions. 39: 1564-1581.
Tsern-Huei L. 2004. Correlated token bucket shapers for multiple traffic classes. Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004 IEEE 60th . 7: 4672-4676.
Au T. M. and Mehrpour H. 1994. Worst case analysis of leaky bucket regulators in broadband integrated networks. TENCON '94. IEEE Region 10's Ninth Annual International Conference. Theme: Frontiers of Computer Technology. Proceedings. 2: 1095-1101.
Vayias E., Soldatos J., and Kormentzas G. 2006. Traffic shaping based on an exponential token bucket for quantitative QoS: implementation and experiments on DiffServ routers. Comput. Commun. 29: 781-797.
Daian D. S. and Giura D. H. 2011. Traffic shaping and traffic policing impacts on aggregate traffic behaviour in high speed networks. Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI), 2011 6th IEEE International Symposium. 465-467.
Caini C. and Firrincieli R. 2004. Packet spreading techniques to avoid bursty traffic in long RTT TCP connections [satellite link applications]. Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC 2004-Spring. 2004 IEEE 59th. 5: 2906-2910.
Weisstein E. Log Normal Distribution. MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource Accessed on 2015.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LogNormalDistribution.html.
Sadeghi M. and Barati M. 2012. Performance analysis of Poisson and Exponential distribution queuing model in Local Area Network. Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE), 2012 International Conference. 499-503.
Guatelli S., Mascialino B., Pfeiffer A., Pia M. G., Ribon A., and Viarengo P. 2004. Application of statistical methods for the comparison of data distributions. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2004 IEEE. 4: 2086-2090.
Azim A. W., Khalid S. S., and Abrar S. 2013. Analysis of modulation classification techniques using Goodness of Fit testing. Emerging Technologies (ICET), 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference. 1-6.
Kassim M. I. M., and Yusof M. I. 2015. A New Adaptive Throughput Policing and Shaping Algorithm on Campus IP-based Network. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 71: 79-83.
Kassim M., Ismail M., and Yusof M. I. 2014. Adaptive throughput policy algorithm with weibull traffic model for campus IP-based network. Information Technology Journal. 13: 2632-2644.
Kassim M., Ismail M., and Yusof M. I. 2015. A new adaptive throughput policy algorithm on campus ip-based network internet traffic, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 71: 205-214.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AGREEMENT
The manuscript is herewith submitted for publication in the Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC). It has not been published before, and it is not under consideration for publication in any other journals. It contains no material that is scandalous, obscene, libelous or otherwise contrary to law. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, I, as the author, hereby agree to transfer to JTEC, all rights including those pertaining to electronic forms and transmissions, under existing copyright laws, except for the following, which the author(s) specifically retain(s):
- All proprietary right other than copyright, such as patent rights
- The right to make further copies of all or part of the published article for my use in classroom teaching
- The right to reuse all or part of this manuscript in a compilation of my own works or in a textbook of which I am the author; and
- The right to make copies of the published work for internal distribution within the institution that employs me
I agree that copies made under these circumstances will continue to carry the copyright notice that appears in the original published work. I agree to inform my co-authors, if any, of the above terms. I certify that I have obtained written permission for the use of text, tables, and/or illustrations from any copyrighted source(s), and I agree to supply such written permission(s) to JTEC upon request.