Modelling, Simulation and Analysis of PHERB Powertrain

Authors

  • J.S. Norbakyah School of Ocean Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • A.R. Salisa School of Ocean Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia

Keywords:

PHERB, Modelling, Simulation, ADVISOR,

Abstract

Popularity due to high fuel efficiency have made plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) gives a great transformation in reducing fuel consumption, fuel cost and gas emission. Marine transportation such as boat, ship, tanker, bulk carries, tow and tug also need the revolution replacing their diesel conventional with the hybrid electric vehicle. In this paper, plug-in hybrid electric recreational boat (PHERB) was presented. This research aims to present modelling and simulation of main powertrain PHERB based on a mathematical model in MATLAB/SIMULINK environment, in order to respond to power and speed through a drive cycle. The accuracy of the model is compared with advanced vehicle simulator (ADVISOR) software. The result of simulation main powertrain, fuel economy and emission of PHERB and ADVISOR model were compared, and the pro and con were discussed. This model can be used as a reference to build a hybrid electric boat in Malaysia environment.

References

Minami S and Yamachika N. 2004. A practical theory of the performance of low velocity boat. Journal of Asian Electric:2 (1).

Sanna, L. 2005. Driving the Solution: The Plug-In Hybrid Vehicle. EPRI Journal.

Markel T., and Simpson A. 2006. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology. WEVA Journal: 1

Abdul Rahman S, Walker P.D., Zhang N., Zhu. J.G, and Du H. 2012. A Comparative Study of Vehicle Drive Performance and Energy Efficiency. Sustainable Automotive Technologies: 319-324

Salisa A.R., Walker P.D., Zhang N. and Zhu J.G. 2015. Comparative Cost-Based Analysis of A Novel Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle With Conventional and Hybrid Electric Vehicles. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering (IJAME). 11:2262-2271

Wang X., He H., Sun F., Sun X., and Tang H. 2013. Comparative Study on Different Energy Management Strategies for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Energies. 6:5656-5675

S. R. Cikanek, K. E. Bailey and B. K. Powell. 1997. Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle Dynamic Model and Powertrain Control. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico

R. Ghorbani, E. Bibeau, P. Zanetel and A. Karlis. 2007. Modeling and Simulation of a Series Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle Using REVS. 2007 American Control Conference, New York, NY, pp. 4413-4418.

L. Ippoliot, V. Loia and P. Siano. 2003. Extended Fuzzy C-Means and Genetic Algorithms to Optimize Power Flow Management in Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2, pp.359-374.

P. Bowles, H. Peng, X. Zhang. 2000. Energy Management in a Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle with a Continuously Variable Transmission. American Control Conference Chicago, Illinois, June 2000.

Jong-Seob Won, R. Langari and M. Ehsan. 2005. An Energy Management and Charge Sustaining Strategy for a Parallel Hybrid Vehicle with CVT. IEEE Transactions on control system technology, vol. 13, 2, MARCH 2005.

D. Hermance and S. Sasaki. 1998. Hybrid electric vehicles take the streets. IEEE Spectrum, pp. 4852

C. Bourne, P. Faithfull and C. Quigley.1996 Implementing Control of a Parallel Hybrid Vehicle. International Journal of Vehicle Design. 17(5-6). pp. 649-62.

K. L. Bulter, M. Ehsani and P. Kamath. 1999. A Matlab–based modeling and simulation package for electric and hybrid electric vehicle design. IEEE Transaction of Vehicular Technology, vol 48, 6.

Wipke B.K. 1999. ADVISOR 2.1: A User-friendly Advanced Powertrain Simulation using a Combined Backward/forward Approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 48: 1751-1761.

Salisa Abdul Rahman, Nong Zhang and Jianguo Zhu. 2008. Modeling and Simulation of an Energy Management System for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference.

Salisa A.R., Norbakyah J.S., and Atiq W. H. 2015. A Conceptual Design of Main Components Sizing For PHERB Powertrain. Jurnal Teknologi. 76:8: 107–111.

Abdul Rahman S, Zhang N., and Zhu. J.G. 2009. Genetic Algorithm for UTS Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Parameter Optimization. 13th Asia Pacific Vibration Conference.

Abdul Rahman S, Zhang N., and Zhu. J.G. 2010. A Comparison on Fuel Economy and Emissions for Conventional Hybrid Electric Vehicles and the UTS Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle. 2010 The 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE).

Norbakyah J.S., Atiq W.H, and Salisa A.R. 2015. Components Sizing for PHERB Powertrain using ST River Driving Cycle. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer, Communication, and Control Technology (I4CT 2015) Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.

J. Gonder and A. Simpson. 2007. Measuring and Reporting Fuel Economy of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles WEVA Journal, vol.1, pp 1-8.

S. Abdul Rahman, N. Zhang and J. Zhu. 2011. A Comparison on Fuel Economy and Emissions for Conventional Hybrid Electric Vehicles and the UTS Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 60, pp 44-55.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-04

How to Cite

Norbakyah, J., & Salisa, A. (2018). Modelling, Simulation and Analysis of PHERB Powertrain. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 10(2-5), 15–19. Retrieved from https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/4342