Software Testing by Standard Software Metrics Method; Study Case "Mission Planner" as UAV Ground Station Software

Authors

  • Adi Susila Putera Faculty of Computer Science, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia.
  • Fatwa Ramdani Geoinformatics Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia.

Keywords:

Ground Station, Mission Planner, Software Metric, Complexity Software, Windows, Linux, MAC OS,

Abstract

This paper explains the testing of a complexity of software and complexity of flight data from Mission Planner as UAV Ground Station software. Tests were conducted using the software metric method. The analysis, testing, and calculations were applied using the method of software metric to investigate the complexity of the software and the flight data on Mission Planner. The tests were performed on three different OS (operation systems); Windows, Linux, and Mac. The result shows that Windows OS has the most reliable software environment and flight data than the other two software.

References

Pizzi, N. J. (2011). Mapping Software Metrics to Module Complexity: A Pattern Classification Approach. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 4(7), 426–432. http://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2011.47049

Srinivasan, K. P., & Devi, T. (2014). Software Metrics Validation Methodologies In Software Engineering. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 5(6), 87–102. http://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2014.5606

Fenton, N. and Bieman, J. (2014). Software Metrics. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

Mission Planner Home — Mission Planner documentation.Ardupilot.org.. Mission Planner Home — Mission Planner documentation. Available at: http://ardupilot.org/planner/index.html

Fenton, N. E., & Neil, M. (2000). Software metrics. Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering - ICSE ’00, 357– 370.

Humayun, S., & Soomro, M. H. (2013). Application of Standard Software Metrics

Rahul, D. K., Veena, S., Lokesha, H., Vinay, S., Kumar, B. P., Ananda, C. M., & Durdi, V. B. (2016). Development of Voice Activated Ground Control Station. Procedia Computer Science, 89, 632–639. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.06.026

Bukhari, Z., Yahaya, J., & Deraman, A. (2015). Software metric selection methods: A review. Proceedings - 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics: Bridging the Knowledge between Academic, Industry, and Community, ICEEI 2015, 433–438. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI.2015.735254

Fischer, M., & Scholtz, A. L. (2010). Design of a multi-mission satellite ground station for education and research. 2nd International Conference on Advances in Satellite and Space Communications, SPACOMM 2010, 58–63. http://doi.org/10.1109/SPACOMM.2010.1

Pengbo, X., Guodong, J., Libin, L., Lining, T., & Jigan, N. (2016). The Key Technology And Simulation Of UAV Flight Monitoring System, 1551–1557.

Mallick, T. C., Ariful, M., Bhuyan, I., & Munna, M. S. (2016). Design & Implementation of an UAV ( Drone ) with Flight Data Record.

APM Planner 2 Home — APM Planner 2 documentation, Ardupilot.org, 2017. Available: http://ardupilot.org/planner2/.

A. Davis, et al., "Identifying and Measuring Quality in a Software Requirements Specification", Proc. of First Int.. Software Metrics Symposium, pp. 141-152, 1993

D.N. Card and R.L. Glass, Measuring Software Design Quality. Prentice Hall, 1990

Fenton, N. E., & Neil, M. (2000). Software metrics. Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering - ICSE 00, 357– 370.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-15

How to Cite

Putera, A. S., & Ramdani, F. (2018). Software Testing by Standard Software Metrics Method; Study Case "Mission Planner" as UAV Ground Station Software. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 10(1-8), 123–128. Retrieved from https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/3748