Usability Evaluation Model for Mobile Banking Applications Interface: Model Evaluation Process using Experts' Panel


  • Hamisu Ibrahim Abubakar School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia.
  • Nor Laily Hashim School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia.
  • Azham Hussain School of Computing, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia.


Evaluation Process, Experts' Model Evaluation, Mobile Banking,


Many of the existing usability evaluation models for mobile applications have not been evaluated to determine its usefulness, accuracy and applicability in to the real world environment. This may not provide confidence on the side of the evaluator and the results may not be comprehensive and valid. A model for evaluating the usability of mobile banking applications interface is developed in response to usability practitioners and mbanking applications developers’ needs. The experts implemented the model using various m-banking application platforms through heuristic evaluation method. A list of predefined validation measures were used by the experts’ in order to determine the accuracy and applicability of the proposed model. The results show that the model is useful, accurate and can be used for evaluating the usability of m-banking applications interface. Therefore, this paper will benefit both the research community and the usability practitioners towards better understanding of model validation process.


Agrawal, H., Dhotre, K., & Williams, J. A streamlined interface

documentation methodology for mobile user interfaces. Paper presented

at the Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human

Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 2008.

Ahmed, S. S., Rayhan, S. J., Islam, M. A., & Mahjabin, S. Problems and prospects of mobile banking in Bangladesh. Journal of Information Engineering and Applications, 2012, 1(6), 16-34.

Alnanih, R., Ormandjieva, O., & Radhakrishnan, T. A new quality-in-use model for mobile user interfaces. A Paper presented at the Eighth and 23rd Joint International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (IWSM-MENSURA), 2013.

AL-Tarawneh, F.H. A Framework on COTS Software Evaluation and Selection for COSTS Mismatches Handling and Non-functional

Requirements. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia, 2014.

Baharuddin, R., Singh, D., & Razali, R. Usability Dimensions for Mobile Applications-A Review. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 2013, 5(6), p2225-2231.

Coursaris, C. K., & Kim, D. J. A meta-analytical review of empirical mobile usability studies. Journal of Usability Studies, 2011, 6(3), 117 -171.

Dewan, S. M. Issues in M-banking: Challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 2010.

Ensor, B., Montez, T., & Wannemacher, P. The state of mobile banking. Forrester Research, USA, 2012.

Ghotbi, A., & Gharechedaghi, N. N. Mobile Banking, Challenges and Strategies in the Banking System of Iran, 2012. Retrieved on 23/6/2013 from http//:www.researchgate/publication.

Goyal, V., Pandey, U., & Batra, S. Mobile Banking in India: Practices, Challenges and Security Issues. Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer, 2012b, 1(2).

Hearnshaw, HM, Harker, RM, Cheater, FM, Baker, RH & Grimshaw. Experts Consensus on the Desirable Characteristics or review Criteria for Improvement of Health Care Quality. Quality in Health Care; 2001, Vol. 10, pp. 173–178.

Holzinger, A. Usability engineering methods for software developers. Communications of the ACM, 2005, 48(1), 71-74.

Kantner, L., S. Rosenbaum. Usability studies of WWW sites: Heuristic evaluation vs. laboratory testing. Proc. SIGDOC, Snowbird, UT, 153–160, 1997.

Kunda, D. STACE: Social technical approach to COTS software evaluation. Component-Based Software Quality, 2003, pp. 64-84. Berlin Heidelberg: Springerverlang.

Liamputtong, P. Focus group methodology principles and practices. London: SAGE Publication, 2011.

Lin, W.-R., Wang, Y.-H., & Hung, T.-E. Selecting Mobile Banking System Service for Consumers by Using a Combined DEMATEL and ANP Approach. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Management Strategy,2011, Vol. 7, 1-14.

McLellan, S., Muddimer, A., & Peres, S. C. The effect of experience on System Usability Scale ratings. Journal of Usability Studies, 2012, 7(2), 56-67.

Nielsen, J. Heuristic evaluation. Usability inspection methods, 1994b, 17(1), 25-62.

Nielsen, J. Durability of usability guidelines. Retrieved, 11(15), 2005.

Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. Interaction design: beyond human computer interaction: Wiley, 2011.

Singh, A., & Wesson, J. Evaluation criteria for assessing the usability of ERP systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2009 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, 2009.

SP, Mohammed. A process Based Approach Software Certification Model for Agile and Secure Environment. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia, 2015.

Suleiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Mohezar, S. An overview of mobile banking adoption among the urban community. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 2007, 5(2), 157-168.

Suoranta, M. & M. Mattila. Mobile banking and consumer behavior: New insights into the diffusion pattern. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 2004, Vol. 8, No.4, pp. 354-366.




How to Cite

Abubakar, H. I., Hashim, N. L., & Hussain, A. (2016). Usability Evaluation Model for Mobile Banking Applications Interface: Model Evaluation Process using Experts’ Panel. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 8(10), 53–57. Retrieved from

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>