Evaluation Metrics for Air Quality Optimization Utilizing Machine Learning: PRISMA Review

Authors

  • Amir Hamzah Mohd Shaberi Department of Software Engineering and Smart Technology, Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, Perak, Malaysia
  • Sumayyah Dzulkifly Department of Software Engineering and Smart Technology, Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia. Centre of Education Green Technology (EduGreen), Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Shir Li Wang Department of Software Engineering and Smart Technology, Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Che Zalina Zulkifli Department of Software Engineering and Smart Technology, Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia. Centre of Education Green Technology (EduGreen), Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54554/jtec.2025.17.01.001

Keywords:

Air Quality, Machine Learning, Evaluation Metrics, PRISMA

Abstract

Air quality, both indoors and outdoors, is crucial for public health as it affects respiratory conditions and overall well-being. Machine learning (ML) techniques offer innovative solutions for monitoring and predicting air quality. However, choosing the right ML algorithms and evaluation metrics is essential for creating accurate air quality prediction models, as these choices directly impact the accuracy and reliability of the results. This study aims to explore and summarize the literature on the use of ML techniques in predicting and optimizing air quality, addressing the urgent issue of air pollution. The review analyzed papers from two electronic databases, namely Scopus and Science Direct. Information on ML techniques for predicting air quality and identifying the main sources of pollution was extracted from 26 studies. The study focuses on common ML techniques employed in air quality prediction, including classification, deep learning, regression, ensemble learning, and combinations of regression and deep learning. It also identifies the evaluation metrics used to assess the performance of these models, such as recall, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2). By synthesizing existing knowledge, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the metrics researchers use to measure the overall effectiveness of ML algorithms. It serves as a benchmark for future research and guides the selection of appropriate evaluation metrics in the field of air quality prediction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sumayyah Dzulkifly, Department of Software Engineering and Smart Technology, Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia. Centre of Education Green Technology (EduGreen), Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia

 

 

Shir Li Wang, Department of Software Engineering and Smart Technology, Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia

 

 

Che Zalina Zulkifli , Department of Software Engineering and Smart Technology, Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia. Centre of Education Green Technology (EduGreen), Faculty of Computing and Meta-Technology, Sultan Idris Education University, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia

 

 

Downloads

Published

2025-03-19

How to Cite

Mohd Shaberi, A. H., Dzulkifly, S., Wang, S. L. ., & Zulkifli , C. Z. . (2025). Evaluation Metrics for Air Quality Optimization Utilizing Machine Learning: PRISMA Review. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.54554/jtec.2025.17.01.001