Real-Life Faculty Examination Timetabling to Utilise Room Used

Authors

  • San-Nah Sze Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
  • Min-Hui Phang Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
  • Kang-Leng Chiew Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak

Keywords:

Examination Timetabling, Two-Stage Heuristic, Room Utilisation,

Abstract

Examination timetabling is an important and yet tedious task to do in every semester. The large number of courses and students increase the difficulty of developing a good examination timetable. Furthermore, the examination timeslots and rooms are very limited in this case study. Therefore, an improved version of two-stage heuristic is proposed and developed a web-based prototype (Faculty Examination Scheduling System, FESS 2.0) to solve faculty examination timetabling problem at Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS). The prototype has been practically used starting from Semester II, 2016/2017. The main objective of the proposed solution is to maximise the room utilisation and minimise the number of rooms for a splitting examination. The outcome of research not only outperform the previous prototype FESS 1.0 but also enhance the services given by faculty management.

References

A. K. Mandal and M. N. M. Kahar, “Combination of graph heuristic with hill climbing search for solving capacitated examination timetabling problem,” 2015 4th International Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems, pp. 118 – 123, 2015. IEEE.

R. G. Parker and R. L. Rardin, Discrete optimization. Academic Press Professional, Inc., 1988.

E. K. Burke, J. P. Newall, and R. F. Weare, “A simple heuristically guided search for the timetable problem,” Proceedings of the International ICSC Symposium on Engineering of Intelligent Systems, University of La Laguna, 1998.

N. Mansour and G. S. Haidar, “Parallel metaheuristic algorithm for exam timetabling,” Sixth International Conference on Natural Computation, 2010. IEEE.

M. Hosny and M. Al-Olayan, “A mutation-based genetic algorithm for room and proctor assignment in examination scheduling,” Science and Information Conference, 2014. IEEE.

R. Qu, N. Pham, R. Bai, and G. Kendall, “Hybridising heuristics within an estimation distribution algorithm for examination timetabling,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 42, pp. 679-693, 2015. Springer.

E. Burke, D. Elliman, and R. Weare, “Examination timetabling in British universities – a survey,” Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling, pp. 76-90, 1995. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

J. P. Rankhambe and R. Pandharpatte, “A survey on examination scheduling problem (ESP) and hyper-heuristics approaches for solving ESP,” International Conference on Information Processing, 2015. IEEE.

M. H. Phang and S. N. Sze, Web-based final examination scheduling system. (Unpublished degree’s thesis), 2015. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-07

How to Cite

Sze, S.-N., Phang, M.-H., & Chiew, K.-L. (2017). Real-Life Faculty Examination Timetabling to Utilise Room Used. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 9(3-11), 51–54. Retrieved from https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/3183