The Ionospheric Total Electron Content Behavior at Equatorial and Polar Stations

Authors

  • S. Z. Hamzah Wireless and Radio Science Centre, Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor
  • M. J. Homam Wireless and Radio Science Centre, Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor

Keywords:

Equator, Polar, TEC,

Abstract

The characteristic of ionosphere behavior is of spatial and temporal variations. The ionosphere behavior was determined by identifying the total electron content (TEC) variation. The investigation on TEC variation had been made over an equatorial station, Libreville (NKLG) station (0.4162° N, 9.4673° E), and a polar station, Ny-Alesund (NYA1) station (78.9235° N, 11.9099° E) in year 2009 and 2013, each representing different level of solar activity. The hourly averaged vertical TEC (VTEC) is used to observe the TEC variation under diurnal, seasonal, and geomagnetic storm variations. The diurnal TEC variations in March and September 2009 experienced a double TEC peak structure. The TEC variation over the NKLG station in the low and high solar activity depicted the same observation where the TEC variation began to rise until it reached its maximum TEC peak around noon to the late evening, and it falls after the sunset hours until it reached its minimum TEC at pre-dawn hours. The diurnal TEC variations for all months at the NYA1 station showed rapid fluctuations of TEC by the presence of more peaks of TEC. The seasonal TEC variations showed its highest TEC peak in spring and lowest TEC peak in summer at NKLG station during both 2009 and 2013. The great fluctuations of TEC obviously observed during the winter and spring. The maximum seasonal TEC peak at NYA1 station mainly occurred around the late evening hours to the extent of pre-dawn hours. The moderate geomagnetic storm on 22 July 2009 caused an increment of TEC at both stations during the storm time meanwhile the moderate geomagnetic storm on 6 July 2013 caused a decrement of TEC at both stations during the storm time.

References

Chen, C.H., et al., Theoretical study of the ionospheric Weddell Sea Anomaly using SAMI2. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2011. 116(A4): p. n/a-n/a.

Mukherjee, S., et al., Seasonal variation of total electron content at crest of equatorial anomaly station during low solar activity conditions. Advances in Space Research, 2010. 46(3): p. 291-295.

Kumar, S., et al., GPS-TEC variations during low solar activity period (2007–2009) at Indian low latitude stations. Astrophysics and Space Science, 2012. 339(1): p. 165-178.

Nikolaeva, N., Y.I. Yermolaev, and I. Lodkina, Dependence of geomagnetic activity during magnetic storms on the solar wind parameters for different types of streams. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2011. 51(1): p. 49-65.

Newell, P. and J. Gjerloev, Evaluation of SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices as indicators of substorms and auroral power. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2011. 116(A12).

Venkatesh, K., et al., On the performance of the IRI‐2012 and NeQuick2 models during the increasing phase of the unusual 24th solar cycle in the Brazilian equatorial and low‐latitude sectors. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2014. 119(6): p. 5087-5105.

Guo, J., et al., Temporal-spatial variation of global GPS-derived total electron content, 1999–2013. PloS one, 2015. 10(7): p. e0133378.

Wu, Y., et al. Variations of the ionospheric TEC using simultaneous measurements from the China Crustal Movement Observation Network. in Annales Geophysicae. 2012. Copernicus GmbH.

Chauhan, V., O. Singh, and B. Singh, Diurnal and seasonal variation of GPS-TEC during a low solar activity period as observed at a low latitude station Agra. 94.20. dv; 96.60. qd, 2011.

Sharma, K., R. Dabas, and S. Ravindran, Study of total electron content variations over equatorial and low latitude ionosphere during extreme solar minimum. Astrophysics and Space Science, 2012. 341(2): p. 277- 286.

Xu, Z., et al., Variability study of ionospheric total electron content at crest of equatorial anomaly in China from 1997 to 2007. Advances in Space Research, 2012. 50(1): p. 70-76.

Bhawre, P., et al., Study of GPS derived Total Electron Content and Scintillation index variations over Indian Arctic and Antarctic stations. Journal of Scientific Research, 2013. 5(2): p. 255-264.

Makarevich, R.A. and M.J. Nicolls, Statistical comparison of TEC derived from GPS and ISR observations at high latitudes. Radio Science, 2013. 48(4): p. 441-452.

Bahari, S., et al., Study of high-latitude ionosphere: One-year campaign over Husafell, Iceland. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2016. 145: p. 45-52.

Sunda, S., B.M. Vyas, and P.V. Khekale, Storm time spatial variations in TEC during moderate geomagnetic storms in extremely low solar activity conditions (2007–2009) over Indian region. Advances in Space Research, 2013. 52(1): p. 158-176.

Bahari, S.A., et al., Study of high-latitude ionosphere: One-year campaign over Husafell, Iceland. Journal of Atmospheric and SolarTerrestrial Physics, 2016. 145: p. 45-52.

Shagimuratov, I.I., et al., High latitude TEC fluctuations and irregularity oval during geomagnetic storms. Earth, Planets and Space, 2012. 64(6): p. 521-529.

de Jesus, R., et al., Effects of the intense geomagnetic storm of September–October 2012 on the equatorial, low-and mid-latitude F region in the American and African sector during the unusual 24th solar cycle. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2016. 138: p. 93-105.

Adewale, A., et al., Responses of equatorial F region to different geomagnetic storms observed by GPS in the African sector. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2011. 116(A12).

Downloads

Published

2017-11-30

How to Cite

Hamzah, S. Z., & Homam, M. J. (2017). The Ionospheric Total Electron Content Behavior at Equatorial and Polar Stations. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 9(3-8), 1–4. Retrieved from https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/3089