Analysis between Perturb & Observe Controller and Fuzzy Logic Controller for a Photovoltaic System with CUK and SEPIC Converter

Authors

  • H.H. Goh Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.
  • M.S. Anwar Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.
  • Q.S. Chua Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.
  • C.W. Ling Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.
  • K.C. Goh Department of Construction Management, Faculty of Technology Management and Business, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia..

Keywords:

Fuzzy Logic, MPPT, P&O, PV,

Abstract

The power generation is using Photovoltaic (PV) cell is the best alternative developing for fossil fuel since it renewable green power, energy conservation and demand-side management. Solar energy most useful for sustainable development but due to it has a nonlinear current-voltage characteristic. It is difficult to track the maximum power produce by the PV module. This paper presents a comparison between the Single-Ended Primary-Inductor Converter (SEPIC) and CUK converter by using both Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) and Perturb & Observe (P&O) methods in maximum power point tracking (MPPT). In this paper, the performance, advantage and disadvantage for both converters and MPPT algorithm are described. A general model of a Photovoltaic system with proposed MPPT controller and converters is implemented in MATLAB/Simulink software. The input parameter of temperature and irradiation level will be under constant and variable level as to prove the system efficiency towards changing conditions. The simulation result will be analyzed in different case studies in order to prove the effectiveness timely response performances, efficiencies of our power of converting over input power of the PV module and the comparison of transient response of voltage ripple of the systems.

References

S. Venkatanarayanan and M. Saravanan, “Fuzzy logic based PV energy system with SEPIC converter,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2014.

M. Oudda and A. Hazzab, “Fuzzy Logic Control of a SEPIC Converter for a Photovoltaic System,” J. Fundam. Renew. Energy Appl., vol. 6, no. 4, 2016.

H. Rezk and A. M. Eltamaly, “A comprehensive comparison of different MPPT techniques for photovoltaic systems,” Sol. Energy, vol. 112, no. February, pp. 1–11, 2015.

A. M. Atallah, A. Y. Abdelaziz, and R. S. Jumaah, “Implementation of Perturb and Observe Mppt of Pv System With Direct Control Method Using Buck and Buck- Boost Converters,” Emerg. Trends Electr. Electron. Instrum. Eng. An Int. J., vol. 1, no. 1, 2014.

M. K. Dr S.R.Kapoor, “Comparison between IC and Fuzzy Logic MPPT Algorithm Based Solar PV System using Boost Converter,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Eng., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 4927–4939, 2015.

M. A. Soedibyo, B. Amri, “The Comparative Study of Buck-Boost, Cuk, Sepic and Zeta Converters for Maximum Power Point Tracking Pho otovoltaic Using P & O Method,” Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Comput. Electr. Eng., pp. 327–332, 2015.

J.-K. Shiau, Y.-C. Wei, and B.-C. Chen, “A Study on the FuzzyLogic-Based Solar Power MPPT Algorithms Using Different Fuzzy Input Variables,” Algorithms, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 100–127, 2015.

T. P. Sahu and T. V. Dixit, “Modelling and analysis of perturb and observe and incremental conductance MPPT algorithm for PV array using Cuk converter,” 2014 IEEE Students’ Conf. Electr. Electron. Comput. Sci. SCEECS 2014, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 213–224, 2014.

J. Dunia, B. M. M. Mwinyiwiwa, and A. L. Kyaruzi, “ĆUK Converter Based Maximum Power Point Tracking for Photovoltaic System Using Incremental Conductance Technique,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Eng., vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 2349–2163, 2014. [

S. Chafle, U. B. Vaidya, and Z. Khan, “Desing of Cuk Converter with MPPT Technique,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Electr. Eletronics, Instrumentaion Control Eng., vol. 1, no. 4, p. 7, 2013.

O. Kircioglu, M. Unlu, and Sabri Camur, “Modeling and analysis of DC-DC SEPIC converter with coupled inductors,” 2016 Int. Symp. Ind. Electron. INDEL 2016 - Proc., 2016.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-30

How to Cite

Goh, H., Anwar, M., Chua, Q., Ling, C., & Goh, K. (2017). Analysis between Perturb & Observe Controller and Fuzzy Logic Controller for a Photovoltaic System with CUK and SEPIC Converter. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 9(3-7), 81–88. Retrieved from https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/3079

Most read articles by the same author(s)